You should pick investments (and teams) so you win most of your games
Sports metaphors and investing are natural pairs. A good way to look at portfolio management is the NCAA March Madness tournament. As with basketball, you should pick the top-ranked contestants, but also be flexible since things change.
There are four major brackets in the tournament: East, West, Midwest and South. Think of these like the top-ranked asset classes in the markets, such as domestic stocks, international stocks, fixed income, and cash. Within each of these major brackets are the best 16 teams, which represent each of the sectors and sub-sectors in the market, including airlines, utilities, cyclicals, energy and so forth.
Teams and Sectors and Stocks
When the NCAA ranks the best teams, it’s similar to ranking all the sectors and sub-sectors in the markets. There is a best, number one seeded team in each bracket, just like there is a worst, number 16-seeded team in each bracket. What you should consider is ranking all these teams (sectors) and pick the strongest few to focus on when investing your money. If you go one step further and this only pertains to your stock portfolio – consider picking the best players from each of those sectors.
Think about filling out your brackets this year. There are two camps of players who pick brackets. One camp chooses the highest-ranking teams, with an occasional upset here and there. The second camp selects a bunch of the lower-ranked teams to win in hope of getting lucky on an unlikely Cinderella team making it far in the tournament. Here is where the gamblers reside.
What if you ranked your investments and concentrated your picks within the top six to eight teams, year in and year out? Wouldn’t your portfolio stand a better chance of ending up in the Final Four?
There are Very Few Cinderella-Stories
In 2018, the University of Maryland, Baltimore County Retrievers became the first #16-seed to upset a #1 seed when they defeated the Virginia Cavaliers in the first round.
Before 2018, 16-seeded teams were 0-135 against 1-seeds. Sure, there were some close games, but since 1985, only 0.74% of the time has a #1 seeded team lost.
Let’s take it a few steps further:
- There have been eight 15-seeds that have defeated 2-seeds (5.88%) in the first round
- There have been twenty-one 14-seeds that have defeated 3-seeds (15.44%) in the first round
- There have been twenty-eight 13-seeds to defeat 4-seeds (20.59%) in the first round
- There have been forty-seven 12-seeds to defeat 5-seeds (34.56%) in the first round
- There have been fifty-one 11-seeds that have defeated 6-seeds (37.5%) in the first round
Said another way, the bottom two-ranked teams have only won 9 games in the entire history of the tournament. And only one of those won a second game in 2013 when Florida Gulf Coast defeated San Diego State.
Applying March Madness to Your Portfolio
When looking at your portfolio, owning bottom-ranked offerings can be detrimental to your retirement success. If the March Madness tournament teaches us anything about money, it’s that bottom feeding can be a gamble.
If the market declines, which investments do you think will perform the poorest? The top-ranked or the bottom-ranked? Which do you think will hold up best?
For most individual investors, it is absolutely crucial to have a grouping of the top-ranked contenders in your portfolio.
Just because you own the top-ranked names doesn’t mean that you’ll win the championship every year, because no strategy can assure success or protect against loss. In life and retirement planning, the game plan is to win most of the games, even if you never finish the tourney kissing the trophy.
Unlike basketball, investing is not about being right all the time. It’s about recognizing who the best teams are, rotating out of poor performers, subbing in new ones that are ranked higher and being right most of the time.
If you can come to the realization that it’s okay to be wrong – it’s just not okay to stay wrong – then retirement might just come earlier.
The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual security. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing.
All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.